Research / Index

Questions before claims.

A working index of the questions behind the builds. Each record follows the evidence trail from question to related system, experiment, recorded result, current conclusion, and next question.

01

Question

Define the uncertainty before implementation.

02

Experiment

Build the smallest useful test and name its boundary.

03

Evidence

Record measurements, artifacts, and failure modes.

04

Conclusion

State only what the current evidence supports.

05

Next question

Use the result to choose the next experiment.

Research records

Questions connected to evidence.

Autonomous control

RL for Control

Research record

Question

Research question

How can RL policies control dynamic physical systems while remaining bounded and measurable?

Related work

Experiment

Tabular Q-Learning on CartPole-v1

First bounded control baseline with an explicit evaluation threshold.

RL-001 · Open record →

Evidence

Recorded outputs

Mean evaluation reward52.0 +/- 36.7
Threshold success0.0%
Best training episode191
Recorded runs1

Measured CartPole evidence only. It does not establish aircraft-control performance.

Conclusion

Current conclusion

The lab has a measurable learned-control baseline, but no evidence yet that the method is adequate for a nonlinear aerospace system.

Next question

What I would test next

What changes when a learned policy acts on a nonlinear aircraft model with actuator limits, disturbances, and explicit stability constraints?

Open dedicated research page →

Learning to autonomy

Autonomous control

Research record

Question

Research question

How can learned policies make useful decisions in physical systems while remaining measurable, bounded, and understandable?

Related work

Experiment

Deep RL Lunar Lander

First completed Deep RL environment with a recorded policy replay.

RL-003 · Open record →

Evidence

Recorded outputs

EnvironmentLunarLander
MethodDeep RL
ReplayRecorded
BenchmarkNot recorded

The replay is qualitative evidence of learned behavior; reward and robustness benchmarks are not inferred.

Conclusion

Current conclusion

The progression now includes neural RL, but learned behavior in a benchmark environment is not yet evidence of robust autonomous flight.

Next question

What I would test next

Which evaluation protocol should expose policy stability, constraint violations, and generalization before higher-fidelity control tests?

Open dedicated research page →

AI systems engineering

Reliable intelligent systems

Research record

Question

Research question

How should autonomous software expose uncertainty, failure modes, and verification boundaries instead of hiding them behind confident outputs?

Related work

Experiment

Execution-validation pass

Generated code is executed for syntax, import, and smoke-test checks.

SYS-01 · Open record →

Evidence

Recorded outputs

ValidationSyntax / import / smoke test
Output classesMeasured vs inferred
Security boundaryNot claimed

This is a validation pattern, not proof of safe autonomous software.

Conclusion

Current conclusion

Model output and measured execution are different evidence classes. Verification begins when generated work is executed against defined checks.

Next question

What I would test next

What isolation, reproducibility, and adversarial testing are required before generated engineering code can be safely reused?

Open dedicated research page →

Scientific ML

AI for engineering

Research record

Question

Research question

Where can modern AI accelerate engineering work without replacing the measurements, validation, and human judgment that make engineering trustworthy?

Related work

Experiment

Generalized PINN PDE evaluation

Test physics-constrained learning across heat, Poisson, and Burgers cases with reference comparisons.

PINN-01 · Open record →

Evidence

Recorded outputs

Poisson relative L29.96e-5
Burgers max IC error0.0052
PDE examples3 generalized cases
CIPython 3.10-3.12

Project-specific single-configuration measurements, not general PINN performance claims.

Conclusion

Current conclusion

AI becomes more useful in engineering when learned representations remain tied to governing equations, reference solutions, tests, and known scope boundaries.

Next question

What I would test next

Can the same evidence discipline survive when a physics-informed model moves into a higher-dimensional aerospace problem with a stronger numerical baseline?

Open dedicated research page →

Applied learning record

RL Laboratory.

Continue from research questions into hands-on reinforcement-learning experiments, recorded results, theory, learning progression, and failure analysis.

Explore the RL Lab →

Evidence model

A result is useful when its measurement, limitation, and next test remain visible together.